Lagerland Lagerland

Journal · June 20, 2026 · 8 min read

How many steps a day should you aim for? What the large studies found, and how to pick a goal you'll keep

Ten thousand steps is a slogan, not a finding. The large studies of step counts and health point lower, and they agree with each other more than the headlines suggest. Here is what they measured, what they found, and how to turn that into a daily number you will still hit when an app you want is waiting behind it.

Most adults get the bulk of the benefit the research can see somewhere between about 6,000 and 10,000 steps a day. Where exactly depends on age, and benefits start far lower than that. Ten thousand is not where the studies point; it is where a slogan pointed. The four studies below are the ones most of the numbers you read come from.

What did the large step studies find?

Study Who was measured What they found
Lee et al., JAMA Internal Medicine, 2019 16,741 US women, average age 72, followed for about 4 years About 4,400 steps a day was linked to lower mortality than about 2,700. Risk kept falling with more steps until about 7,500 a day, then levelled off
Saint-Maurice et al., JAMA, 2020 4,840 US adults aged 40 and over, followed for about 10 years Compared with 4,000 steps a day, 8,000 was linked to about half the risk of death from any cause (hazard ratio 0.49), and 12,000 to about a third (0.35)
Paluch et al., Lancet Public Health, 2022 47,471 adults pooled from 15 cohorts Risk fell with more steps until about 6,000–8,000 a day in adults 60 and over, and 8,000–10,000 in adults under 60, then levelled off
Ding et al., Lancet Public Health, 2025 57 studies from 35 cohorts Curves bent at around 5,000–7,000 steps for all-cause mortality, new cardiovascular disease, dementia and falls. 7,000 steps a day was linked to 47% lower all-cause mortality than 2,000

Two cautions apply to every row. All four are observational: people who walk more differ from people who don’t in ways no adjustment fully captures, and Ding’s team names residual confounding among their own limitations. And in the two US studies, steps were measured once, with a research device worn for about a week at the start, not tracked for years. Read the numbers as where the curve bends, not as a dose that guarantees an outcome.

They still agree on the shape. More steps go with lower risk, the steepest gains come early, and the curve flattens somewhere in the high thousands. Saint-Maurice’s study is the one that still saw lower risk at 12,000 than at 8,000; the pooled analyses mostly saw the flattening sooner.

Where did 10,000 steps come from?

Not from a study. In a 2004 review, Tudor-Locke and Bassett traced the figure to Japanese walking clubs and a business slogan from more than three decades earlier. They proposed rough bands for healthy adults that are still quoted:

Steps a day Their label
Under 5,000 Sedentary
5,000–7,499 Low active
7,500–9,999 Somewhat active
10,000 or more Active
Over 12,500 Highly active

The same review noted that 10,000 may not be sustainable for some groups, including older adults and people living with chronic disease, and pointed to goals set relative to a person’s own starting point as a promising alternative. Twenty-one years later, Ding’s meta-analysis landed in a similar place: 10,000 can still be a target for people who are already active, while 7,000 may be more realistic for many.

Does pace matter, or only the total?

Mostly the total. In Lee’s study and in Saint-Maurice’s, the measures of how fast people walked were linked to lower mortality at first, but once total steps were taken into account, most of those links were no longer clear. Paluch’s meta-analysis found one exception that held: the fastest 30 minutes of the day still showed a link after adjusting for the total, while time spent above 100 steps a minute did not.

For a sense of what brisk means, the CADENCE-Adults study measured treadmill walkers aged 21 to 40 and set 100 steps a minute as a practical threshold for moderate intensity and 130 for vigorous. Pace may add something, but the number to get right first is the daily total.

How long does each goal take?

At about 110 steps a minute, a brisk walk, here is how long each goal takes as a single continuous walk:

Daily goal Continuous walking at 110 steps a minute Where it sits in the research
4,000 about 35 minutes Just under the roughly 4,400 that Lee linked to lower mortality than about 2,700 in older women
7,000 about 65 minutes Ding’s comparison point: 47% lower all-cause mortality than 2,000
8,000 about 75 minutes Inside Paluch’s flattening range for adults over 60; the bottom of it for under 60
10,000 about 90 minutes The top of Paluch’s range for adults under 60
12,000 about 110 minutes Still lower risk than 8,000 in Saint-Maurice’s US sample

Those minutes overstate the effort. A daily total counts every step: the kitchen, the office, the shop. The deliberate part is the gap between your goal and what an ordinary day already gives you. If you have a heart condition, an injury or another reason to be careful with exercise, ask a doctor before you tie anything to an activity target.

How do you pick a goal you’ll keep?

  1. Find your baseline. The Steps chart in the Health app shows a daily average for the last week or month. That number, not 10,000, is your starting point.
  2. Set the goal one walk above it. A goal you reach on an ordinary day without trying is no goal. A goal you only reach on your best days is a lockout. Aim for a number that an ordinary day reaches only if you add one deliberate walk.
  3. Raise it when it gets easy. Moving up after a few weeks of hitting it is cheap. Starting too high and quitting is not.
  4. Plan for the days that differ. A desk day and a Saturday rarely produce the same count, so it can make sense to give them different goals instead of one compromise number.

Step count is a weak number to read for health day to day; it moves with where your phone was and what kind of day it was (more on that). As a target it works better, because a daily total is exactly what these studies measured.

How EarnLock uses the number

EarnLock keeps the apps you choose shielded until you reach a daily activity goal, so the choice of goal decides whether it feels like a price or a wall. The argument for paying in movement is a separate post; this is how the goal itself works.

  • Three presets and a custom number. Onboarding offers Light (4,000 steps), Standard (8,000, selected by default) and Challenge (12,000), each with a walking-time estimate based on 110 steps a minute rounded to five minutes: about 35, 75 and 110 minutes. A custom number can be set later from the goal settings.
  • Steps, or Apple’s own activity measures. Steps is the free goal. Premium adds active minutes, which is Apple’s Exercise time, the green ring that Apple describes as minutes of brisk activity (presets 20, 30 and 45), and active energy (150, 300 and 500 kcal).
  • One total per day, from Apple Health. EarnLock asks HealthKit for today’s total since local midnight. HealthKit’s statistics queries merge data from all sources before adding it up, and Health ranks overlapping sources, so steps your iPhone and Apple Watch both counted aren’t counted twice. The Apple Watch app reads Health on the wrist, so the count is there on a walk without the phone.
  • The shield shows the gap. A blocked app shows how many steps are still needed. If the shield’s copy of your count is too old to trust, it asks you to open the app instead of showing a stale number.
  • The day resets at midnight. Reach the goal and the apps stay open until local midnight; then the count starts again from zero.
  • Raising is free; lowering waits. You can raise the goal at any time. Lowering it starts a 24-hour cooldown before it can be lowered again. Premium has an optional bypass, usable once every seven days.
  • Different goals for different days. Premium schedules can swap in Light, Standard or Challenge for chosen days and hours, which is the weekend-versus-desk-day point above.
  • A week to calibrate. For the first seven days nothing is blocked. EarnLock records how often the goal would have stopped you, so you can adjust before it starts to cost anything.

A daily threshold isn’t the only design. Some step apps sell screen time by the step instead; Steppin, for example, pays out minutes per hundred steps. EarnLock’s threshold asks for one daily total, which is the unit all of the studies above used.

If you don’t know where to start, take the Health app’s daily average, add a walk, and round to the nearest preset. Standard’s 8,000 sits where the pooled studies see the curve start to flatten for most adults. Light’s 4,000 is a starting point for a much lower baseline, not a destination.

Questions

Frequently asked

How many steps a day should I aim for?
For most adults, a goal between about 7,000 and 10,000 steps a day sits where the large studies see the benefit of more steps start to flatten. A 2022 meta-analysis of 15 cohorts found risk kept falling until about 6,000–8,000 steps a day for people aged 60 and over and 8,000–10,000 for people under 60. If you walk far less than that today, a goal a little above your current average is the better start, because benefits begin at much lower counts.
Is 10,000 steps a day necessary?
No. A 2004 review traced the number to Japanese walking clubs and a business slogan from more than 30 years earlier, not to research. Later studies found lower mortality at well under 10,000: about 4,400 steps a day in older women compared with about 2,700, and a curve that flattens around 6,000–8,000 for adults over 60. A 2025 meta-analysis concluded that 10,000 can still be a target for people who are already active, while 7,000 may be more realistic for many.
How many steps a day by age?
In the 2022 meta-analysis by Paluch and colleagues, which pooled 47,471 adults from 15 cohorts, mortality risk fell with more steps until about 6,000–8,000 steps a day among adults aged 60 and over, and until about 8,000–10,000 among adults under 60. Beyond those ranges the curve levelled off. The study did not set separate targets for other age bands.
Does walking pace matter, or only the number of steps?
In the large studies, the total mattered more. In older women (Lee et al., 2019) and in US adults aged 40 and over (Saint-Maurice et al., 2020), measures of stepping intensity were no longer clearly linked to mortality once total steps were taken into account. In the 2022 meta-analysis, the fastest 30 minutes of the day still showed a link after adjusting for total steps. For reference, about 100 steps a minute is a reasonable threshold for moderate intensity in adults aged 21 to 40.
How long does it take to walk 8,000 steps?
At about 110 steps a minute, a brisk walk, 8,000 steps is roughly 75 minutes of continuous walking. In practice it takes less deliberate walking than that, because your daily total also includes every step you take at home, at work and on errands.
What step goal should I set in EarnLock?
EarnLock offers three presets, Light (4,000 steps), Standard (8,000, the default) and Challenge (12,000), plus a custom number. A good choice is a goal you reach on an ordinary day only if you add one deliberate walk. You can raise the goal at any time; lowering it starts a 24-hour cooldown before it can be lowered again, so a hard day can't talk the goal down twice.

Mentioned in this post

Apps in this story

More from the journal

Keep reading.